01
Assess
Map your data, find the gaps, set a baseline — in plain language, ranked by assurance risk.
You get A gap map
Our method.
Don’t take the number on trust.
Don’t take the number on trust.
Follow how we got it.
ESG advice has a trust problem: the common critique is that consultants check whether you disclosed, not whether the disclosure reflects what happens on the ground. We answer it the only way we can — by making our method auditable, so you can test the working rather than take our word.
Assess
Comply
Improve
Prove
◇ THE METHOD · ASSESS → COMPLY → IMPROVE → PROVE
Four steps you can audit.
You see the working at every stage. Measurable by design — the number is built to be checked from the moment it is produced, not reconstructed later to satisfy an auditor.
02
Comply
Prepare the disclosure to the standard and the assurance bar — not a report, a filing with evidence attached.
You get A filing, evidence-backed
03
Improve
Turn required reporting into operating and financing value — the disclosure becomes a lever, not a cost.
You get A prioritized action list
04
Prove
Build the audit trail — the source, control, and evidence path behind every number, ready to re-walk.
You get An auditable trail
◇ TEST THE WORKING
Trace a number, end to end.
Don’t take our word for it — follow one figure from raw source to assured disclosure. Step through it: the working shows at every stage.
Illustrative worked example
Scope 2 emissions · one reporting year
1,240tCO₂e
SOURCED
No number ships without all four.
Start from what’s real.
The figure begins as primary evidence — the monthly utility invoices for the kWh you actually drew. Nothing is claimed until it’s tied to a source you can point to.
Utility invoices · metered kWh
Built to the standard.
Consumption is converted with the published grid emission factor under the GHG Protocol — the same method applied to every period, so the number is consistent, not bespoke.
GHG Protocol · location-based factor
Re-walkable by an auditor.
Every input carries its source, the factor version, and each calculation step. An assessor can reproduce the figure from scratch — the working is on file, not in someone’s head.
Calculation workbook · evidence pack
It stands up.
The figure and its full trail survive independent, auditor-grade testing to the highest bar — whether that is a lender’s IFC / Equator E&S review or BRSR-Core reasonable assurance. Now it’s defensible evidence, not an assertion.
Assurance file · reasonable assurance
◇ MEASURABLE IMPACT
How measurable impact happens.
Not a slogan — a shape. A figure is taken from an unverified baseline to a measured, assured position, and the working is shown the whole way up.
Over 25 years, our parent practice, Teravue, has taken emitters from a baseline to a measured, assured reduction — the backbone the Teravora method is built on. As we complete engagements in India, our own results appear here, measured the same way. [ Specific figures shown once verified. ]
01 · Baseline
Start from what is real.
An unverified starting point — data as it sits today, gaps and all. No number is claimed until it is sourced.
02 · Measured
Build the number to be checked.
Each figure is produced with a documented source and control — measurable by design, from the moment it exists.
03 · Assured
Stand up to the auditor.
The evidence path is complete: the disclosure survives independent, auditor-grade testing — the assured peak.
◇ DEFINED ONCE
The standards we work to.
One term per concept — the frameworks that govern every number we prepare, so a disclosure maps cleanly to what your assurer and your lenders expect.
BRSR · BRSR-CoreBusiness Responsibility & Sustainability Report — SEBI’s listed-company disclosure and its assured core subset.
GRIGlobal Reporting Initiative — the widely-used sustainability reporting standard.
TCFDTask Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures — climate risk in financial terms.
IFRS S1 / S2ISSB’s global baseline for sustainability and climate-related disclosure.
GHG ProtocolGreenhouse Gas Protocol — the standard for carbon accounting across scopes.
IFC StandardsIFC Performance Standards — environmental and social risk for project finance.
Equator PrinciplesThe risk-management framework for financing large projects responsibly.
The single point of view
What “Measurable Impact” means here.
Measurable Impact is a standard we hold ourselves to, not a slogan. Every number is measurable by design — sourced, controlled, evidenced, so it can be checked.
We will not publish a Teravora result we have not verified — and our tools will not display a number that is not substantiated.
EVERY-NUMBER DISCIPLINEMEASURABLE BY DESIGN
SOURCE · primary evidence on file
CONTROL · checked to the standard
EVIDENCE · an auditor can re-walk it
No number ships without all three.
See the method. Now put it to work.
Bring us your deal, or your deadline. A specialist scopes a proposal — a real person, not a form receipt.
◇ COMMON QUESTIONS
The method, briefly.
Four auditable steps — Assess → Comply → Improve → Prove. You see the working at every stage, so a filing becomes a defensible disclosure rather than a set of assertions.
Every number is produced with a documented source, control, and evidence path from the moment it exists — so it can be checked, not just claimed.
Not until they are verified. The track record shown is our parent practice, Teravue, attributed over 25 years. Teravora’s own results appear as engagements complete, measured the same way.
BRSR / BRSR-Core, GRI, TCFD, IFRS S1/S2 (ISSB), the GHG Protocol, the IFC Performance Standards, and the Equator Principles.